Thursday, October 18, 2007


Part of a series on Twelver Shia Islam Alevism Ali-MuhammadShah Ismail Hajji Bektash WaliAtaturk
Haqq-Ali-Muhammad Four DoorsInsan-i Kamil The Qur'anThe Buyruk Wahdat-ul-WujoodAlevi ZahirBatin
FastingSemahMusic CharityIntercessionTaqiyya Dushkunluk Meydani
DedesMurshidPir RehberDargaJem Cem EviBabas NowruzAshura Hindrellez
BektashiKizilbash MarxistsKemalists
Alevis or Alevi-Bektashis (Turkish: Aleviler or Alevilik,Kurdish: Elewî) are a religious community in Turkey, making up approximately 20% of the population of the country. There are also familiar Bektashi communities in Albania, Republic of Macedonia, Bosnia and Bulgaria due to the presence of the Ottoman Janissaries during Ottoman times.
Alevism is a Shia Islamic belief, meaning that they are politically attached to the 4th Islamic Caliph, Imam Ali and the Imamah and do not recognize the first 3 Caliphs. However, this is the extent of similarity between Alevism and Orthodox Shia beliefs. Shia is a term used for any beliefs having its main structure relying on following the path of Imam Ali, no matter how different they are. Other Shia groups are Ismailis (Nizaris & Bohras), Zaidis, Jafaris, Oveyssi, Kubrawiya, Alawis, Bektashism, Nurbakshis.
Contrary to the mainstream orthodox Muslims of the World, Alevism is a heterodox belief. Whilst orthodox Islam possess a tradition of authoritative religious scholarship backed by carriers of formal learning, Alevism lacks both.
The influence of Alevism can be seen in various related movements, doctrines, ideas, rituals and traditions such as Qizilbashism, Bektashism, Hurufism, Qalandariyah, Wafaism, Haydarism, Babaism etc., its strength lying in shared local traditions and esoteric interpretations of Islamic belief and practice.
Modern Alevi theology has been profoundly influenced by humanism and universalism. Thus, while many of the older generation view Alevism as a religious belief, many of the younger generation prefer to term it a philosophy, some even making connections with Marxism. Alevi communities are strong supporters of Kemalism due to its strong secularist ideology.

Etymology
Adherents of Alevism (Alevîlik) are called Alevis. The exact number of Alevis is not known, with estimates varying between 15% to 35% of the population of Turkey alone, i.e. 10 - 25 million believers in Turkey.
Besides the Alevis of Turkey there are significant number of Bektashis scattered around the Balkans with Albania being the center of these Bektashis.
In Northwestern Iran and Northern Iraq there are similar beliefs such as Ibrahimi, Sarliyya, Kakai, Shabak and Ahl-i Haqq. The adherents of these beliefs are mainly Kurds and some Turcomans. The number of these adherents are not accurately known, but estimates points toward some millions.
Both Bektashis Qizilbash Alevis revere Hajji Bektash Wali, a saint of the 13th century. The Turkish language and Kirmancki language is used in Alevi rituals and while worshipping.

Alevis
After the death of Muhammad his followers were divided into who should lead the Muslim community. The modern day Sunni majority elected Abu Bakr, while the modern day Shia maintained that Ali, the son-in-law of Muhammad, was his legitimate successor. This rift was widened when Hüseyin, grandson of Mohammed was killed in the Battle of Karbala, an event which is memorized intensively by Alevis and Shias alike. The Alevis also recognize twelve Imams similar to the Twelver community.
Sufism has also had an important influence on the Alevi traditions. The Sufi philosopher Hajji Bektash Wali, who spent most of his life as a missionary from an Iranian based sufism sect among Turkish tribes in Central Asia and Anatolia during the 13th century, is highly revered. Most of his followers belonged to the Turkmen tribes. The tribes, who tried to keep their traditional customs, often stood in opposition to the Seljuk and later the Ottoman Empire. In the late 15th century, a militant Shia order, the Qizilbash, fought with the Safavids against the Ottomans. After Safavids lost their power, they were assumed to have been absorbed into the Anatolian Alevis. Kurdish Alevis are sometimes still called Qizilbash ("Red head", derived from the head wear of the believers which included a red piece of cloth, hence the name). Even as far East as Pakistan, many Shias have "Qizilbash" as their family names. [1]
According to Alevists, one of Imam Ali's most revered quotes addressing his followers had been, "Be a child of your own times!", meaning, go with the requirements of the historical era in which you live; follow what is best for you as the changes in time and place might change the course of your personal as well as your ethnic life.

History
Ethnic groups that have Alevi adherents mainly include Turks (Turks & Azeris), Kurds (Kurmanji & Kirmancki/Zaza) with a particular concentration in central Anatolia in a belt from Chorum in the west to Mush in the east. The only province within Turkey with an Alevi majority is Tunceli, formerly known as Dersim.
In addition, many Alevi have migrated to the large cities of western and southern Turkey, as well as to western Europe, especially Germany.
Today, the Alevi community in Turkey is heavily urbanised due to mass migration (1960s to present) from their often mountainous and barren rural home districts to cities.
There are also large communities of Alevis in some regions of Iranian Azerbaijan. The town of Ilkhichi (İlxıçı), which is located 87 km south west of Tabriz is almost entirely populated by Alevis. For political reasons, one of which was to create a distinct identity for these communities, they have not been called Alevi since the early 20th century. They are called various names, such as Ali Illahi, Ahl-i Haqq and Goran. Groups with similar beliefs also exist in Iranian Kurdistan. Interestingly both the Dersim (Kirmancki / Zaza) people and the Gorani, who are both considered as belonging to the Hawramani branch of the proto-Kurdish language, adhere to a form of Alevi faith which resembles in many significant respects, such as the perpetuation of a caste system, the religions of the Druze or Yazidi.

People

Beliefs and Practices
The nature of Alevi faith can be hard to define, as they do not have a central authority and are based on an orally transmitted tradition, which has been kept secret from outsiders for centuries. So various descriptions of Alevism can be found by different groups.
Despite disputes regarding the non-Islamic origins of Alevism, most Alevis believe their path is true Islam originated with Mohammad and Ali.
Many Alevis stress the liberal and humanistic values of Alevism as a world-view, while others deny that Alevism is an Islamic sect, and claim that it is an independent religion with origins in the pre-Islamic religions that the Turkic people came into contact with during migration to Anatolia. The predominant religions which are claimed to have shaped Alevism are Yazidism, Yazdânism the Ahl-i Haqq and Yarsanism, still present in the area where Kurds live and its vicinity. All three of these religions do not claim to have Islamic origins, nor do their adherents claim to be Muslims.
While the Sunnis recognise the four caliphs: Abu Bakr, Umar, Uthman and Ali, the Twelver Shias (incl. the Alevis) recognise Ali as the first of the 12 Imams of the Muslim community.
The fundamental Shia beliefs within Alevism are more similar to Nizari Shia-Imami-Ismailism than with Ithna'ashari Shiism (otherwise known as Twelver Shiism), and the likenesses are striking.
The basis of most Alevi beliefs is found in the Buyruks, written by Hajji Bektash Wali and many other notable Alevi 'holy men.' Some of the more doctrinal beliefs are only considered static by the Bektashi Order of Dervishes, which is like the monastic order within Alevism, and are interpreted freely within mainstream Alevi communities.
Alevis in their contact with Christians note that the difference between them and the Christians is "as thin as the inside lining of an onion."

Introduction
The name Alevi can be simply translated into English as "of Ali" or "follower of Ali." It fits a pattern in Turkish for common names of two other major religious groups: Musevi, (follower of Moses (Musa), or Jewish); and İsevi, (follower of Jesus (İsa), or Christian).
There is much debate as to actually when the broad Anatolian population which today call themselves Alevis actually took on that name. For our purposes here, it is enough to simply know that today they do prefer to call themselves Alevi.
It is visibly obvious that Ali ibn Abi Talib is extremely important to modern Alevis. His picture is prominent in every Alevi worship place and association, and it often appears on the cover of Alevi publications. Many families place pictures of him in their homes. And some, particularly young people, wear small gold replicas of Ali's sword, Zulfikar, attached to chains around their necks.
While there is a wide variety of opinions among Alevis about exactly who Ali was or is, almost all Alevis agree on the following:
1. Ali was Muhammad's cousin (amca oğlu) and son-in-law (damat), marrying the latter's daughter, Fatima.
2. Ali was the first to believe in Muhammed's prophethood; therefore he became the first Muslim.
3. Ali was the closest human being to Muhammad.
4. Ali was Muhammed's intended successor, and therefore the first caliph, but competitors stole this right from him. Muhammad intended for leadership of Muslims to perpetually stem from his family line Ahl ul-Bayt beginning with Ali, Fatima, and their two sons, Hasan and Hussain. Ali, Hasan, and Hussain are considered the first three imams, and the other nine of the Twelve Imams come from Hussain's blood line.
Most Alevis believe that the 12th imam, Muhammad ibn Hasan ibn Ali, grew up in secret to be saved from those who wanted to wipe out the family of Ali. Many Alevis believe that he is in occultation and will return as the Mahdi.
Apart from these basic ideas, there is a wide spectrum of opinion even among Alevis as to the true nature of Ali. The following ideas are all based on a combination of Qur'anic verses, hadith, and folklore. Here are some of the most common concepts of Ali circulating among today's Alevis.
1. Ali is the ultimate example of the perfect human, apart from the prophets. Ali is attributed with nearly supernatural strength and spiritual wisdom, giving him a place almost as high as a prophet. An example of this thought is the saying (sometimes attributed to Muhammed):
"Muhammed is the city of spiritual knowledge, Ali is the door."
Muhammed ilim şehridir, Ali kapısıdır.
2. Ali is equal to Muhammed in enlightenment and authority. Ali and Muhammed are likened to the two sides of a coin, or two halves of one whole apple, as in the following poem:
"Ali is Muhammed, Muhammed is Ali;
I saw one apple, praise Allah"
Ali Muhammed'dir, Muhammed Ali
Gördüm bir elmadır, elhamdü-lillâh
Again, from a saying attributed to Muhammed:
"Before the creation of Adam, we were one glorious light; the light of glory on Adam's forehead was divided into two; one half appeared on my forehead, the other on Ali's."
Hz. Âdem yaratılmadan önce tek nur idik; Hz. Âdem'in alnındaki nur ikiye bölünmüş ve birisi benim, birisi de Ali'nin alnında doğmuştur.
3. Ali is deity in a trinity with Allah and Muhammed.
Most Alevis recite this phrase in their prayers: "For the love of God, Muhammed, Ali" (Hak-Muhammed-Ali aşkına). When many say this and the phrase, "Allah-Muhammed-Ali" they are intentionally equating the authority of the three.
4. Ali is deity by himself.
In a poem written by a Bektashi lodge leader named Hilmi Dede Baba and commonly quoted by Alevis, the poet says that wherever he looked - at Adam and Eve, at Noah, at Abraham, or even in the mirror - "Ali appeared before my eyes" (Ali göründü gözüme). I understand the poet to mean that Ali is timeless and present everywhere. The poem also declares:
"He is Jesus, the spirit of God,
He is king of this world and the next,
He is the protector of the believers,
Ali appeared before my eyes"
İsa-yı ruhullah O'dur
İki alemde Şah Odur
Müminlere penah O'dur
Ali göründü gözüme
The poem's final stanza says,
"Ali is first, Ali is last,
Ali is inner knowledge,
Ali is external knowledge,
Ali is pure, Ali is glorious"
Ali evvel Ali ahir
Ali batın Ali zâhir
Ali tayyib Ali fâhir
One more poem cited by Alevis is attributed to Jalaladdin Rumi (Mevlana), who was among the greatest of Turkish mystics, but himself not considered an Alevi.
"At the coming into existence of the world,
Ali was present.
While the world was forming,
Ali was there.
Until the world took its basic form,
The one present was Ali."
Cihan var oldukça Ali var idi.
Cihan var olurken de Ali vardı.
Cihan'ın temeli suret buluncaya kadar
Var olan Ali idi.
VI. Alevis, Haji

Essential Views
Debated Views Ali
All of the Twelve Imams share the same 'light' or Noor as Ali, therefore Ali ibn Abi Talib was the 'First Ali' (birinci ali), Hussayn ibn 'Alī was the 'Second Ali' (ikinci ali), Hassan ibn 'Alī was the 'Third Ali' (Ūçüncü Ali) etc.. up to Muhammad al-Mahdi the 'Twelfth Ali' (Onikinci Ali).

Twelve Imams
Like other heterodox Islamic beliefs, Alevism also belongs to the Batini (Esoteric) interpretation of Islam. The Batini groups are almost exclusively Shiitic, which Batini groups claim, is an indication that the True Path of Imam Ali was a Batini one.
The contrast to Batin (Esotericism) is Zahir (Exotericism). Alevis belief that the Quran possesses both a Zahiri and Batini meaning, but the Batini meaning is held as a Holy Secret (Sır) and teaching the Secret to strangers has been strictly forbidden. But these rules are not being followed in modern days. Most Alevis believe the Quran is missing hundreds of verses about Ali.
The Zahiri part of Islam is believed to be the 1st (Sharia) of the total 4 Doors, in Alevi theology. Alevis believing to have passed the Sharia Door, therefore do not adhere to the normal Sharia, the Islamic legal code, including;
but instead follow the demands and rules of the 2nd Door, Tariqa.

Not performing the Salah (namaz) ritual.
Not performing Wudu, the ritual ablutions of Muslims.
Absence of mosques in Alevi communities, they have their own ceremonial halls called Cemevi.
Men and women pray together in all religious services and they are not segregated in secular life. Esotericism (Batinism)
Alevism has a concept of God at different levels, all being emanations of Haqq the Ultimate Reality. The underlying concept within Alevism is that there only exists one and the same religion and that each religion usually degenerates into establishing a priesthood and a hierarchy, uses as time passes, invariably degraded knowledge to control fellow men and societies in order to obtain privileges. Consequently new prophets emerge to preach the original message, which briefly can be summarized as 'love thy neighbor.' But underneath any exoteric concept of God, there is a chain of emanation from God to spiritual man, man on earth, animals, plants and minerals. This concept is called Wahdat-ul-Wujood.

God
Haqq-Muhammad-Ali. In the Shia Islamic context Ali is given the dominating role - like Christ for many Christians. In the Alevi context God seems to be beyond reach and Muhammad is clearly eclipsed by Ali. These aspects of the instruction were scanty and unclear and it shall not be excluded that I have over-interpreted them in order to arrive at a comprehensible picture. Drawing comparisons of the Alevi concept of 'trinity' to the Christian concept it can be explained thus: God the Father seems to be pure spirit or pure truth, and accordingly taking no interest in the lives of individual human beings. God the Son seems to correspond to Perfect man 'Insan-i Kamil who has achieved union with God, represented by i.e. Abraham, Moses, Jesus, Buddha, Muhammad and Ali according to denomination. God the Holy Spirit seems then to correspond to the Spiritual Self, the Voice of Conscience, guiding man on his way to perfection and union with God.

'Trinity'
Muhammad and Ali ibn Abi Talib are identified as one being in such a way that the two are like two sides of a coin.

Muhammad-Ali
Müsahiplik; a covenant relationship between members of the community. In a ceremony in the presence of a dede, the members make a life-long commitment to care for the spiritual, emotional, and physical needs of each other and their children. The ties between couples who have made this commitment is at least as strong as it is for blood relatives. So much so, that müsahiplik is often called spiritual brotherhood (manevi kardeşlik), the children of covenanted couples may not marry.

Spiritual Brother/Sisterhood
The central Alevi corporate worship service is called a Jem (Turkish: Cem or ayini Jem, meaning congregational or assembly meeting). Alevis prefer to believe that the Jem has its roots in an original worship and teaching meeting of forty spiritual individuals Kirklar Majlisi (Turkish: Kırklar Meclisi) led by Ali.

The Jem
Alevi leadership does not follow the same model of Muslims, instead they have Dedes and Babas.

Leadership
Alevis practice Taqiya, the dissimulation of one's Alevi identity or beliefs to outsiders. This is less true since the last quarter of the 20th century due to urbanisation and emigration.

Taqiya
According to Australian anthropologist, Dr Sevgi Kilic, while Alevi women do not experience gender segregation in the private and public domain they are however subject to traditional male values about women's sexuality and constructed within the honour/shame paradigm. Dr Sevgi Kilic, is of Alevi heritage and her family migrated to Australia some 40 years ago. Growing up in a western society she was unaware of the rich culture and traditions and the unique identity of the Alevi and she poignantly reveals how she 'learnt to be an Alevi' through the narratives of the women in her study. This ethnography is the first on Alevi women in Turkey and argues that Alevi identity is complex, diverse and rich in its theory and practice. Hence, while rural Alevi women ascribe to traditional conservative views about women's status in the family these ideas rapidly change within an urban environment where many are compelled to work as domestic servants, and in other low paid jobs. Unlike Sunni women in Turkey, Alevi women are not required to wear a headscarf or other bodily coverings. According to Kilic this is because Alevi identity is very much focused on the internal rather than the external representation and covering women's hair or concealing the female body in and of itself cannot legitimize women's moral, social, political and economic worth. Thus an unveiled Alevi women cannot impugn her honour or her communities. Thus Alevi women's bodies are what Kilic calls paradoxically 'neutral'and acts as an 'ideology of difference.'
Alevis are not the only Islamic sect in which women do not wear the headscarf. Ismailis do not only not wear it, but are forbidden from doing so by the Aga Khan.

Headscarf
Alevism has three fasts, different from the Islamic Saum. These are:
Also the dates can be different: Most use the mooncalender but some use the suncalender

The fast during the first 12 days of the Muslim month of Muharram (or Mâtem Orucu), which comes 20 days after Eid ul-Adha (Kurban Bayramı). Another Alevi fast is the three-day Hizir fast (Hızır Orucu), generally observed on the 13-14-15 February.
In addition to abstaining from food, the Alevi fast includes abstaining from drinking water both day and night. They will intake liquids other than water during the evening. During the fast, Alevis will also avoid any sort of comfort or enjoyment. The main exoteric purpose of this fast is to mourn the murder of Ali's son, Hussain, during the battle of Karbala. The main esoteric purpose is self-sacrifice for character building. At the conclusion of the fast of Muharram, a special food dish called ashure (aşure) is prepared from a variety (often 12 in number) of grains, fruits and nuts. Many events are associated with this celebration, including the salvation of Hussain's son, Zaynul Abideen, from the massacre at Karbala, thus allowing the bloodline of the family of the prophet to continue.
Many Alevis fast for three days in mid-February to honor Khidr (in Turkish: Hizir), a supernatural being akinned to the Green Man who they believe has been sent by God throughout history to save those who are in distress. Fasting
Alevis are not expected to give Zakat in the Islamic mode and there is no set formula or amount. A common method of Alevi almsgiving is through donating food, especially sacrificial animals, to be shared with worshippers and guests. Alevis also donate money to be used to help the poor, to support the religious, educational and cultural activities of Alevi centers and organizations (dergâh, vakıf, dernek), and to provide scholarships for students.

Almsgiving
Ritually visiting Mecca is not an Alevi practice. However, visiting ziyarat and performing dua at the tombs of Alevi-Bektashi saints or Pirs is quite common. Alevis are not commanded or required to make these visits. They do not go to gain credit in heaven. Their purpose is to ask for spiritual cleansing and blessing for themselves or others. Some of the most frequently visited sites are:
1. Hacibektas, Kirshehir Hundreds of thousands of Alevis gather in the memory of Haji Bektash at his lodge (tekke) and tomb every 16 August.
2. Abdal Musa, Tekke Koyu, Elmalı, Antalya
Its special celebrations are held in June.
3. Shahkulu Sultan, Merdivenköy, Istanbul
Jem services are held here every Thursday and on Alevi holidays.
4. Karacaahmet Sultan, Üsküdar, İstanbul
Jem services are also held here every Thursday and on Alevi holidays.
5. Seyit Gazi, Eskishehir
6. Pir Sultan Abdal Kültür Etkinlikleri, Banaz Koyu, Yildizeli, Sivas
Celebration held every year (23-24 june) in honur of Pir Sultan Abdal

Pilgrimage
'Semah' is the Alevi ritual dance characterized by turning and swirling, this dance of worship has many varieties. 'Semah' is quite similar to pre-islamic Turkish religous worship dances made by shamans. Performed by men and women to the accompaniment of the Bağlama, the semah is an inseparable part of any ceremony. It symbolizes the putting off of one's self and union with God.

Ritual Dance
'Four Doors, Forty Levels (Dört kapı kırk makam)'
One key way Alevis describe how they are different than those who follow Islamic law Shari'a, but also love the family of the prophet, is with the concept of Four Doors, Forty Levels (dört kapı kırk makam). This is the process by which an individual commits him or herself to a living spiritual guide (dede, pir, mürşit) and that spiritual leader guides the person through a series of four "doors" (kapı), each of which has ten "levels" (makam). The individual enters the first door as a novice. The person who makes it through to the fourth door achieves oneness with ultimate truth (hakikat). The doors' names are religious law, spiritual path, spiritual knowledge/skill, and spiritual truth (şeriat, tarikat, marifet, hakikat).
To Alevis, anyone who only believes in the rule of religious law has not advanced beyond the most basic level of spiritual knowledge. Whoever has entered the next level through a relationship with a spiritual guide has left religious legalism behind and started on the path of inner, deeper spiritual insight.
This belief is shared with Ismailis.

Four Doors
The "Perfect Human Being" or "Insan-i Kamil" is an important Alevi concept, it is the prototype human being, pure consciousness, our true identity, to be contrasted with the material human who is bound by its senses and materialism. A human task is to fully realise this state whilst still in material human form and thus become liberated from sin.
Somewhat comparable to the and the Purusha of Samkhya Hinduism and the Adam Kadmon of Lurianic Kabbalah, it also has similarities with the Anthropos of Gnosticism and Manichaeism.
Today's Alevis would define the perfect human in practical terms as one who is in full moral control of his or her hands, tongue and loins (eline diline beline sahip), treats all kinds of people equally (yetmiş iki millete aynı gözle bakar), and serves the interests of others. It is the goal of all Alevis to achieve the moral standards of the perfect human being. One who has achieved this kind of enlightenment is also named "Eren" or "Munavver."
This concept is oftentimes explained as the esoteric meaning behind practicing the Sharia, as well as explaining the Qur'anic concept of human beings not having original sin, because the centre of consciousness is pure and perfect. However, esoteric explanations (known as Batini Ta'wil) are commonplace and varied amongst Alevis due to the plurality of meanings.

The Human Prototype
Alevi mysticism is essentially monistic, therefore Alevism has the concept of the worshipper becoming one with Haqq, that is, Reality, the "Ultimate Truth." Mansur Al-Hallaj, a 10th century Sufi uttered the phrase, "I am Truth" (Ana al-Haqq). Religious authorities interpreted this statement as Mansur's literally equating himself with Allah. He was assassinated in Baghdad for his so-called blasphemous mystic beliefs. This is often narrated by Alevis.

Union with God

lighting candles at the tombs of saints;
kissing door frames of holy rooms;
not stepping on the threshold of holy buildings;
seeking prayers from reputed healers;
writing wishes on strips of cloth and tying them to trees that are considered to be spiritually powerful;
making 'Lokma' and sharing it with the people which is believed to give prosperity and luck Folk Beliefs
A Turkish scholar working in France has distinguished four main groups among contemporary Alevis, which cautiously show their distinctive features in modern Turkey}.
The first is mainly represented by the urban population and emerged during the Republic. It has for decades belonged to the political left and regards Alevism as an outlook on life more than a religion. The followers hold ritual unions of a religious character and have also established cultural associations named after Pir Sultan Abdal. Man enjoys a central role as illustrated by the phrase 'God is Man' quoted above in the context of the Trinity.
The second group is more directed towards heterodox mysticism and stands closer to the Haci Bektashi Brotherhood. St Francis of Assisi and Mahatma Gandhi are considered better believers than many a Muslim.
The third group regards themselves as true Muslims and are prepared to cooperate with the state. It adheres to the way of Jafar as-Sadiq, the sixth Imam. Its concept of God is closer to orthodox Islam but as the two groups already mentioned it considers the Qur'an to have been manipulated by the early Sunni Caliphs in order to eliminate Ali.
The fourth is said to be under active influence from official Iranian Shia, to be confirmed adherents to Twelver Shia and to reject Bektashism. It follows Sharia and opposes secular state power. Information on strength and location is not available.

Internal Groups
An Alevi dede is the equivalent to a socio-religious leader in the Alevi community.
The institution of dede is the most important of all the institutions integral to the social and religious organization of the Anatolian Alevis. Although much weakened as a result of the socio-economic transformation experienced in Anatolia towards the end of the nineteenth century, and particularly due to accelerated migration from the rural to the urban areas after the foundation of the Turkish Republic, it played a primary role in the survival of Alevism until today.
The institution of dedes is based on a three tiered hierarchy:
1-Murshid 2-Pir 3-Rehber
In some regions this hierarchy is modified in such a way that the Pir and Murshid change places. This is exclusively a functional hierarchy, as all involved come from a dede family. They fulfill functions that are complementary in nature, and would be meaningless in isolation from each other. The dede families, all of them called 'ocakzades', had distributed these duties among themselves.

Alevi dede
According to the books of the Buyruk which include the basic principles of the Alevi faith, and the traditions that survive among the Alevis, a dede must have the following qualifications:

To be a descendant of the Prophet (ocakzade)
To operate as an educator and a moral guide (mürebbi) for the community
To be knowledgeable and exemplary in his character and manners (insan-i kamil)
To follow the principles written in the Buyruks, as well as the established traditions of Alevism. Qualifications of a Dede
The main functions of the dedes can be summarized as follows:

To guide and enlighten (irşad) the community in social and religious matters.
To lead the religious rituals
To punish the criminals, and to serve as an arbiter between conflicting sides.
To lead ceremonies during occasions such as a wedding or a funeral.
To fulfil certain legal and educational functions
Provide health provisions.
Provide socio-political leadership.
In some exceptional cases, such as in the Dersim province, dedes share the leadership position with the large landowners, the Agas. Legal Functions
The resolution of Alevi community disputes or problems in a Dushkunluk Meydani (Turkish: Düşkünlük Meydanı) or 'People's Court' presided over by the Alevi dede.

Dushkunluk Meydani
The institution of Dedes have played an important role and fulfilled important function among the Alevis. While today it seems the Dede function is being revived in a different shape and with different functions that correspond with the needs of the contemporary Alevi community.

Today
An Ojak (Turkish: Ocak) is a form of Alevi hearth linked to the Alevi dedes.
In terms of their internal organization, every Alevi-Bektashi community follows a particular dargah [convent] or ocak [hearth]. Socially, the discipline connected to one's affiliation with a dargah or ojak is of primary importance.

Ojaks
The relationship between Alevis and Sunnis is one of mutual suspicion and prejudice, dating back to the Ottoman period. Sunnis have accused Alevis of heresy, heterodoxy, rebellion, betrayal and immorality. Alevis, on the other hand, have argued that the original Quran does not demand five prayers, nor mosque attendance, nor pilgrimage and that the Sunnis distorted early Islam by omitting, misinterpreting, or changing important passages of the original Quran, especially those dealing with Ali and ritual practice.

Relations with other Muslim groups
Nowruz (Turkish: Nevruz) literary means the new day is the day of 21 March is known by most Turkic people and Alevis as a day of newness, reconciliation, and the start of spring. Many Alevis also believe that 21 March is the birthday of Ali. Some also believe that it is the wedding anniversary of Ali and Fatima, the day Joseph was pulled out of the well, and the day God created the earth. Noruz is celebrated with jems and special programs. Nowruz is the Alevi New Year. The same day has been celebrated by Iranians as the New Year for thousands of years. Originally, Nowruz was a secular festival. March 21 is the first day of the spring equinox.
According to legend, Khidr (known in Turkish as Hizir) and the prophet Elijah or Ilyas drank of the water of life. Khidr comes to the rescue of those in distress on land, and Elijah helps those at sea. It is believed by many that they meet at a rose tree in the evening of every 6th of May. The festival is also celebrated in parts of the Balkans by the name of "Erdelez" and always falls on the same day as Djurdjevdan or St. George's Day.
Ashura is marked as the conclusion of the Muharram fast and as a commemoration of the martyrdom of Hussain.

Nowruz
Hidrellez
Ashura Festivals
Alevi religious musical services are referred to collectively as cem or âyîn. Their purpose is not only to focus on spiritual exercises that include elements of zikr (without controlled breathing but with some elements of body posturing) and ritual dance (sema) accompanied by sung mystical poetry in the vernacular and the sacred ritual instrument known as balama or saz (plucked folk lute with frets). They also serve to reinforce social solidarity and correctness of behaviour through inculcating the beliefs and doctrines of the sect and saintly figures as well.
Music is performed by individuals recruited from Alevi communities and descended from holy lineages of religious leaders known as dede. These specialists are viewed with respect and known as zâkir, aik, sazende or güvende, depending on regional usage. Many are also known to be poet/minstrels (aik, ozan) who perpetuate the tradition of dervish-lodge (tekke) poets such as the much loved and admired Yunus Emre (13th century), Nesîmî (14th century), Pir Sultan Abdal, Hata'î and Genç Abdal (16th century) and Kul Himmet and Kul Hüseyn (17th century). The poetry was composed in the Turkish vernacular and follows the principles of folk prosody known as hece vezne in which the focus is the number of syllables.
The specialized sacred musical repertoire of Alevi musicians includes deyi (songs of mystical love), nefes (hymns concerning the mystical experience), düvaz or düvâzdeh imâm (hymns in honor of the 12 Alid imams), mersiye (laments concerning the martyrdom of the imam Huseyn at Kerbela), miraclama (songs about the ascent of the prophet Muhamad to heaven) and sema (ritual dance that is accompanied by folk lutes and sung poetry). The dances are performed with dignity by couples, and choreographies employ circle and line formations as well as arrangements where couples face one another, thus synchronizing their movements more closely. As the tempo of the music increases, the figures become more complex and intense. There are many regional variants of sema, but the most widespread and important are the Dance of the Forty (Krklar Semah) and the Dance of the Cranes (Turnalar Semah) where the movements of the dance illustrate links to a shamanistic legacy and the transformation of shamans into birds who take flight.
The gathering of the forty saints refers to the moment, after the Prophet's ascension to heaven, when he beheld the manifestation of Divine Reality in Ali. The Alevis believe that this gathering can be viewed as the prototype for their central rite (âyîn-i-cem, görgü cemi), the Rite of Integration. This is a complex ritual occasion in which a variety of tasks are allotted to incumbents bound together by extrafamilial brotherhood (musahiplik) who undertake a dramatization of unity and integration under the direction of the spiritual leader (dede). The dede interacts formally with his 12 assistants and the body of worshippers as he applies Alevi religious idioms that reinforce links to Sunni Islam, the Bektai order of Dervishes and Shii Islam as well. The âyîn-i-cem can be heard on the JVC CD Turkey. An Esoteric Sufi Ceremony. Unfortunately for non-specialists, the notes are very vague and give no indication of location, performers, musical genres or poetic forms. The recording was made in Istanbul in 1993, and the ceremony includes in an order typical of a cem: a deyi that reiterates the line of descent of the sect in a historical framework, two düvaz (one based on the poetry of Hatayi, and the other on the poetry of Kul Himmet), prayer formulas, the illâllâh genre that incorporates the tahlîl formula into the poem to create an atmosphere of zikr while sect members create rhythmic intensity by hitting their knees in time to the music and sway their bodies slightly, the Dance of the Forty (Krklar Semah), the Dance of the Cranes (Turnalar Semah) and prayer formulas.

Alevi Music
Alevis have a significant role in Turkish music and poetry. Pir Sultan Abdal, a 16th century Alevi poet whose poems and songs often contain spiritual themes, is revered as a saint and hero. Important figures are the Sufi poet Yunus Emre, widely regarded as having been Alevi, and Kaygusuz Abdal. Their poems shape Turkish culture up to now, and are also performed by modern artists. Songs attributed to these poets have been embraced by left-wingers in the 20th century. The aşık bards are also influenced by Alevi tradition.
Many of the major traditional musicians in Turkey are Alevi, including Arif Sağ, Musa Eroğlu, Erdal Erzincan, Neşet Ertaş, Muharrem Ertaş, Aşık Mahzuni Şerif, Aşık Feyzullah Çınar, Aşık Veysel Şatıroğlu, Ali Ekber Çiçek, Sabahat Akkiraz, Belkıs Akkale. Other non-Alevis, such as Ruhi Su and Zülfü Livaneli, have recorded many Alevi songs. Mercan Dede, an artist whose music combines electronic and traditional sufi elements, has made some songs involving Alevi themes in cooperation with singer Sabahat Akkiraz. [2]

Music and poetry

Video Clips
Below are a series of videos from Turkish television showing a Jem services, otherwise known as "Aynul Jem." See above section on the Jem for a description.
Part One http://www.youtube.com/v/a_Ehvodq4t0
Part Two http://www.youtube.com/v/QU8ErPl0Ilc
Part Three http://www.youtube.com/v/E9hUUnBnGcc
Part Four http://www.youtube.com/v/JaUwwDlWXY8
Part Five http://www.youtube.com/v/eoiCknfmExM
Part Six http://www.youtube.com/v/xPd9U0A94gM
Part Seven http://www.youtube.com/v/EYSNELigIGs

Other Videos

Wednesday, October 17, 2007

Peter Krause
For the comic book artist, see Peter Krause (artist).
Peter Krause (last name pronounced /'kɹəʊ.sə/) (born August 12, 1965) is an American film and television actor, best known for his lead role of Nate Fisher on the popular HBO drama Six Feet Under.

Biography
Krause was born in Alexandria, Minnesota. Growing up, he was a skilled track and field athlete, but he suffered an unfortunate pole vaulting injury in high school that ended his athletic career. He attended Gustavus Adolphus College in St. Peter, Minnesota and became interested in theatre. Graduating from Gustavus Adolphus in 1987, he decided to pursue acting as a career and enrolled in the Master of Fine Arts program at New York University. While working as a bartender in New York City, he met writer Aaron Sorkin.

Tuesday, October 16, 2007


The word Anglosphere describes a group of anglophone (English-speaking) nations which share historical, political, and cultural characteristics rooted in or attributed to the historical experience of the United Kingdom. The Anglosphere includes those former colonies and dominions of the UK where English is the main language.
The term is usually attributed to science fiction writer Neal Stephenson, used in his 1995 novel The Diamond Age. Its first published use after this was in an article by James C. Bennett entitled "Canada's World Advantage" which appeared in a Canadian newspaper, The National Post, on 4 January 2000 (page A16). The term "Anglophonie" is used rarely,

Definitions and membership
A leading advocate of the importance for contemporary international relations of a concept of Anglosphere is James C. Bennett, founder of The Anglosphere Institute. His book The Anglosphere Challenge: Why the English-Speaking Nations Will Lead the Way in the Twenty-First Century (ISBN 0-7425-3332-8), published in 2004, is an extended exposition of his version of the concept.

Bonding qualities
The group of nations have a history of co-operation and close political ties. A network of varying military alliances as well as intelligence arrangements (such as the UKUSA Community which runs Echelon, or the ABCA agreement) exists between the US, the UK, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand, and some are in free trade areas with each other. The countries of the Anglosphere were military allies in major world conflicts in the 20th century, most importantly World War I, World War II, and the Cold War. The US, the UK, and Australia co-operated in the 2003 invasion of Iraq, while other NATO allies of the United States did not participate.
On the other hand, the group is in no sense a bloc. During the 1950s and 1960s the Suez crisis and Vietnam War caused divisions on how to approach regional conflicts. Common ground has not always been attainable between the Anglosphere members. During the 1980s New Zealand adopted an anti-nuclear policy, and declared a nuclear-free zone around the country. Visiting United States warships that would not confirm or deny the presence of nuclear arms were thus banned from entering New Zealand ports. This led to a period of ostracism of New Zealand, an ally in previous conflicts.
Polls have shown that most citizens of Anglosphere nations regard other Anglosphere countries as their closest "friends and allies". The United Kingdom, Australia and Canada are usually named as the United States' closest friends and allies, while the other nations routinely list the US and the UK at the top of their lists.
The Anglosphere nations freely interchange cultural materials. Certain actors, directors, movies, literature, and TV shows enjoy high levels of popularity across the Anglosphere nations. The USA remains the largest global exporter in film, television and music; within the United States, many prominent actors and some musicians originate from other Anglosphere nations. Stars such as Russell Crowe (New Zealand and Australia), Jim Carrey (Canada), Charlize Theron (South Africa), Bono (Ireland), Orlando Bloom (England), Nicole Kidman (Australia) and Arnold Vosloo (South Africa) often appear to transcend their birth nationalities, and instead adopt cross-cultural identities that have earned them great popularity with fans of all seven nations. The Anglosphere's main cultural divide continues to be over sports, which vary considerably from nation to nation, with football (in its varying forms), cricket, rugby, ice hockey, curling and baseball having different popularities.

English-speaking world Anglosphere co-operation and common ground
The Anglosphere as a concept has attracted some debate. Critical views overlap, and also extend over a number of schools of thought.

Criticism
Some have criticised the term as an application of ethnocentrism to international relations by implying that certain nations and their cultures are superior to others. Journalist George Monbiot wrote, "instead of the Ummah, the anglosphere... I don't hate Britain, and I am not ashamed of my nationality, but I have no idea why I should love this country more than any other. There are some things I like about it and some things I don't, and the same goes for everywhere else I've visited."

Cultural relativists
Regionalists believe that the idea of cultural alliances is a distraction from regionally-based unions or partnerships, such as NAFTA and The Americas in United States and Canada, the European Union for the United Kingdom or Oceania and the Asia-Pacific for Australia and New Zealand.
Regionalists tend to be on the left wing. In the United States they tend to favour immigration from South and Central America.

Regionalists
Realism is a defined school of thought on international relations, more interested in maintaining effective power dynamics and self-gain than culture partnerships. It sees power as the defining factor in a state's relations, and may conclude that culture is irrelevant, aside from perhaps as a propaganda source. The clash between realists and Anglospherists may be sharper than any clash with another school.
Realists argue that it is dangerous for one power to see itself as having a permanent alliance with another power whose interests in a few years may be at odds with their own.
The most notable clash between Anglospherists and realists came during the Suez crisis, when the United States and Canada refused to support the UK over the Anglo-French Suez Canal intervention (with Israel's collusion).
A second spot of tension came during the Falklands War, during which some realists in the administration of President Ronald Reagan encouraged the United States not to support the British side of the conflict. Some held the view that an Argentinian defeat would endanger the military Government, with the possible risk of it being replaced by a Communist Government, which would have weakened the US position in the Cold War. In the end the realists lost the argument however, and the US provided moral and logistical support to the UK after the failure of Alexander Haig's diplomacy.
Most recently since 2003, the Iraq War emphasised differences. Canada and New Zealand refused to support combat activities conducted by the coalition with the other three countries (other than with small contingents engaged in ancillary activities).

Realists
Autonomists criticise the Anglosphere concept from the cultural side. They argue that the culture of a particular society is either largely home grown, or consists of many more factors than simple heritage from the "Anglosphere", and that the Anglosphere concept tends generally to underestimate the impact of non-English cultures, such as the Scots-Irish, Irish, Scottish, Welsh, German, Dutch and Québécois cultures. They argue that in all member states, there is wide variation from the supposed distinctive characteristics of the Anglosphere.
In the United States autonomists tend to be natural cultural conservatives, while in Australia they are found both on the right and the left (e.g. see the 1930s Australia First Movement). In the United Kingdom, they also fall across the political spectrum (see Merry England).

Autonomists
Other critics treat the Anglosphere concept as political rhetoric, with aims they claim are identifiable. They argue that Thatcherites and Reaganites have used it to try to consolidate the political position they achieved during the 1980s and first half of the 1990s. Margaret Thatcher's administration, for instance, was centralising, in certain ways, with local government less autonomous and financially more constrained. These critics have argued that conjuring up visions of a unique political heritage is simply part of a power grab by forces that still serve corporatist aims.

Critics of Neo-Liberalism
When considering for purpose of argument a six-country Anglospheric model (USA, Canada, UK, Ireland, Australia, New Zealand), the Anglosphere is made up of three regions, each split into a larger dominant "core" and a smaller subsidiary "satellite state". Namely:
The association of an entire cultural region with the dominant "core" nation state is typically resented by the smaller "satellite" state. Irish, Canadian, and New Zealand identity is to some extent defined by its otherness, in a sort of "sibling mentality". Comparing the Australia-New Zealand relations with that of Canada and the United States, a number of parallels exist. Although on a global scale, Australia and New Zealand combined are smaller than Canada by any metric, and they, along with the United Kingdom and Ireland, and the rest of Europe for that matter, are also viewed by many as satellites of the United States and its global influence. Nevertheless, the satellite states, in this particular regional model, have developed a world-view and foreign policy that places a greater emphasis on multilateral rather than unilateral institutions. Certainly, Ireland has been first a neutral nation, then oriented towards the EU. This tendency was partially illustrated during the build-up to the 2003 invasion of Iraq which saw the Anglosphere satellite states (Canada, Ireland, and New Zealand) refuse to involve themselves, in direct contrast to the three core states (USA, UK, and Australia), although the full reason for this division is perhaps more complex and nuanced. It should be noted, also, that this model does not consider the unpopularity of the Iraq war among the UK and Australian general populations and the contributions made by other countries such as Italy, Spain and Japan.

Europe: United Kingdom + Ireland
North America: United States of America + Canada
Australasia: Australia + New Zealand The core-and-satellite model
The United States, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Ireland are all former colonies of the British Empire, and the first four of these were settled by immigrants from Britain and Ireland. The similarities of these countries, it is sometimes argued, were manifested by certain historical conditions which they have all faced.
Anglosphere nations have a history of co-operation and close political ties. A network of varying military alliances as well as intelligence arrangements exists between five of the nations, and some are in free trade areas with each other. The countries of the Anglosphere were military allies in the majority of major world conflicts in the 20th century. The United States, the UK, and Australia continued in this vein in their cooperation in the 2003 invasion of Iraq, a venture in which other close allies of the United States did not participate.

Historical perspectives
Seeking to make a distinction between the Anglosphere and other countries of Europe or European Union ("the continent", or "continental Europe", as it is sometimes referred to) comes down to identifying key differences between the United Kingdom and the other members of the European Union. Arguing that the Anglosphere is culturally different from "Continental Europe" assumes inter alia that there is a unified "continental" European culture, something which is not supported by historical perspective.
There are certainly key cultural differences between the United Kingdom and individual European states (e.g. France or Italy), but it would be difficult to sustain an argument that the culture of the UK is in some way unique in its distinctiveness when set against the massive diversity of "the continent" as a whole. It is possible to probe the continent's internal diversity by reflecting on the cultural similarities and differences of the following pairs of countries: Finland and Portugal, Lithuania and Italy, Bulgaria and Norway. However, if one is to generalise, the United Kingdom is perceived by most commentators to be more culturally similar to the near neighbour countries of northern and western Europe (e.g. Ireland, Netherlands, Sweden) and less similar to those of eastern Europe.

The United Kingdom and the European 'Continent'
Advocates of the view that British culture is distinct from 'European' culture often draw on France as an example. Whilst it is possible to gain important insights into both cultures by probing the culture differences between the two states, there are undoubtedly many more cultural similarities than differences between the two countries, which are geographically close (France is one of the UK's nearest neighbouring states) and whose history and language are deeply intertwined (reference the history of the two states since 1066, the date of the Norman invasion of England and victory over the English at the Battle of Hastings).
In the Middle Ages, England and France emerged as distinct leading European nation-states. They were often at war. For centuries the English monarchs spoke French had extensive holdings in Northern and Western France (at various times Calais, Normandy, Britanny, Anjou, Aquitaine). The motos on the UK royal coat of arms is still in in French. Until 1801, the Royal Arms also contained the Arms of France (three gold fleurs-de-lis on a blue background) in one quarter, dating from the claim to the French throne made by Edward III in 1337 that lead to the Hundred Years' War.
From the 17th century onward, as the two countries conquered extensive empires outside Europe, each attempted to increase its colonial possessions and prevent the other from doing so. France lost most of its possessions in India and North America to the British in the 18th century, although the British later lost the 13 colonies of the United States which revolted with French assistance. The rivalry was renewed in the scramble for Africa in the 19th century. Although both countries have lost their empires, apart from a few residual dependencies, and are now members of the European Union, some traces of Anglo-French rivalry remain.
In language, on the other hand, there has been a profound mutual influence between Anglophone and Francophone cultures. After the Norman Conquest of England in 1066, French remained the language of the English court and ruling class for three hundred years. Mediaeval English grew from the need for communication between the Norman French speaking lords and their English peasants who spoke Anglo-Saxon with Norse/Danish influences. This is why it has a much simplified grammar (for example most words do not have gender and verb declension is limited). Other migrations of French speakers to England were Huguenots and Waloons fleeing wars of religion in the 16th century, and royalist refugees from the French Revolution at the end of the 18th century. Roughly a third of the vocabulary of the English language (e.g. agree, brave, carry, define, empire, etc.) comes from the French language. The English have without compunction seized new words from many other languages while French academics are called upon instead to devise new French words that conform to existing French vocabulary and in particular to resist Franglais. The French strive to maintain their language as part of their cultural heritage whilst the English are disinterested in attempting to control the evolution of their language.
In this debate, the example of Canadian confederation - the ongoing interaction between French and English Canada providing a major impetus in its development - is a prominent one, reflected in Canada's membership in both the Commonwealth and La Francophonie.

Cultural differences: The example of the UK and France
Regardless of the distance separating America from Europe (unlike the United Kingdom's proximity), the country's population is also significantly descended from non-Anglo European immigration during the 19th and 20th centuries. The total number of immigrants from European regions other than England largely outnumbers those of English ancestry. Louisiana was originally a French colony with French settlers; parts of New York and New Jersey were originally a Dutch colony, New Netherland; while Florida and the entire Southwestern United States were originally Spanish possessions. Furthermore, the Southwestern United States, which includes what are now the country's two most populous states in California and Texas, was part of Mexico until well into the 19 century. There have been numerous non-British influences in the United States. All manner of Continental European cultures are now fused in the United States.
According to the most recent census, only 8.7% of Americans claim to have predominant English ancestries, with other British and Irish groups such as the Scottish, Welsh and Scots-Irish each making up less than 2% of the population. Combined however, British and Irish ancestries would by far be the largest ancestral group in the US (~ 25% of the population). This figure would be even greater if one includes those claiming 'American' ancestry, but who are also of British Isles origins. The top three ancestries in the United States are German (15.2%), Irish (10.8%), and African (8.8%). Italians (5.6%), Polish (3.2%) and French (3%) are also major self-identified continental European ancestries.
America has a history of direct contact with Europe, other than through the United Kingdom's affairs.

The USA and continental European influence
Proponents of the concept of Anglosphere argue that no English-speaking country ever was ruled by an absolute monarch, hence none has ever seen the effectiveness and sheer dominance of such rulers as Peter the Great of Russia, Frederick the Great of Prussia, or King Louis XIV of France. This is however only true for those countries outside the British Isles, and the United States was born of a struggle, the American Revolution, against taxation imposed, if not by an absolute monarch, then by a non-representative British colonial government. Ireland, largely English speaking, made many attempts to throw off the English (later British) yoke, until successful in the 20th century in obtaining home rule for geographically the greater part of Ireland as a 'free state' and later completely independent status as a republic. The power of the English kings was gradually eroded with milestones being actions to wrest power from the king by the nobility at Magna Carta and by the landed commons in the English Civil War and English Restoration. The English Civil War and Glorious Revolution could quite well be considered as struggles against attempts by kings of the Scottish Stuart dynasty, Charles I and James II/VII, to re-establish an absolute monarchy in both England and Scotland. It can be argued that James's overthrow began the modern English parliamentary democracy: never again would the monarch hold absolute power.
At the time of the Holy Alliance, after the Napoleonic Wars had ended, democratic reforms started earlier in the UK, with Catholic Emancipation in 1829, propelled by the economic and social changes spoken of as the Industrial Revolution. The process took a century to complete, however, if universal suffrage is taken as the marker. Other European countries overlapped in particular reforms. The character of UK politics differed in several ways from those prevalent in continental Europe, with anti-clericalism largely absent and feeling against the monarchy rarely politicised, British socialism more closely allied with the Protestant religious tradition and British right-wing and nationalist thinking considered by some to have been largely moderated by Disraeli's conservative thought (if one excepts the Irish Home Rule question, to 1922). As a result, Continental European politics appears to be more driven by partisan feeling.

The United Kingdom and the 'continental' experience: political history
A certain residual resistance against the metric system is symptomatic in the USA and UK. On the other hand, Ireland, Australia, Canada and New Zealand have largely embraced the metric system in principle, if not always in practice.
English-speaking countries, except for the state of Louisiana, and parts of Canada, have not had legal systems based on the Napoleonic Code. The case of Scotland is considered anomalous, since its system is an older system largely independent of common law. Some states in the USA, that at one time were a part of the Spanish Empire and later Mexico have vestiges of the Napoleonic Code. The community property statutes in regards to family law (most relevant in divorce property distribution) that are present in California and seven other western states are an example of this.
No English-speaking country ever had a government installed by Napoleon, though there were some Bonapartists in England. The foreign princes (Dutch and German following the Glorious Revolution) ruling in England were in theory constitutional monarchs, on sufferance. On the other hand, there was an earlier scare that England would become a fief of the Holy Roman Empire's premier Austrian family when Philip Habsburg was king in right of marriage to Mary Tudor.
No English-speaking country (save, perhaps, Ireland, and in more modern times, South Africa) had the secret police that existed throughout Europe in the late eighteenth century and throughout the nineteenth century, and which were brought to a higher level under Napoleon. (This ignores some facts about British government actions, in particular in the Jacobin scares of the 1790s; it might be defended as a broad description of policy, such as the non-recognition of a minister for the Interior).
Against this one can argue that the UK and USA have in fact fundamental divergences in a number of aspects of their institutions. These include separation of religion and politics, the constitutions and the monarchy. Analogies between the UK, largely run from Whitehall, and the USA, which is a federal political system, are treacherous.

Institutional history
The consequences of the World War I did not result in fascism or communism being adopted in the Anglosphere; there were fascist and communist sympathisers, but they never gained political power except in some very limited ways. None of the countries was occupied by the Fascist powers (except the Channel Islands, which are crown dependencies rather than part of the UK), and some United States territory in the Pacific (Attu and Kiska in the Aleutian Islands, Wake Island, and Guam).
The philosophical trends in the United Kingdom, with logical positivism gaining at one point the upper hand, and in the United States, with a consistent strand of interest in types of pragmatism, differ from the existentialism and later philosophical trends in continental Europe. This distinction became sharp around 1930.
Identity cards were used in the UK as part of a National Register 1915-1919 and 1939-1952. Otherwise identity documents have not yet been required. Their introduction was motivated by the government wish to register adults for possible conscription for the two world wars, although they were retained for a period after each conflict.
Discussion of Anglo-American diplomacy is often formulated, from the UK side, in terms of the existence and health of the special relationship, mostly harking back to the years 1941 to 1945 of very close alliance. This could be called a 'Churchillian' formulation.
The Anglosphere has cemented itself in formal alliances, such as that of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization and ANZUS, and is more directly manifested in the existence of the ABCA Armies and the UKUSA Community, an intelligence-gathering alliance formed by Anglosphere members.

Commonalities in the twentieth century
Some view as an example of this an increase in centralised state control in the UK, examples being the National Curriculum, and the proposed introduction of identity cards in the UK. Police powers have been recently expanded slightly in the USA post-9/11. The REAL ID Act in the US centralises state-issued identification cards.
Samuel P. Huntington, in his controversial work Who Are We? The Challenges to America's National Identity (2004), claimed that America's national identity is largely based on Anglo-Protestant culture, and that Latino culture represents a threat to that heritage; in other words, the USA is subject to a pull towards Latin America.

Sources

ABCA Armies
Anglo

  • Anglo-American relations
    Anglo-Australian relations
    Anglo-Catholicism
    Anglo-ethnic

    • Anglo-Celtic Australian
      Anglo-Irish
      Anglo-Indian
      Anglo-Norman
      British New Zealander
      English-American
      Anglo-Saxon

      • Anglo-Saxons
        Anglo-Saxon language
        ANZUK
        ANZUS
        Cultural regions

        • Sprachraums

          • Anglo-America